Measurement of Loss Aversion Behavior Under Prospect Theory: Comparison of Various Kinds of Individuals

Authors

  •   Mu-Lan Wang Assistant Professor, Department of Finance and Risk Management, Ling-Tung University of Technology, No. 1, Ling-Tung Rd., Taichung City, 408
  •   Hung-Hsi Huang Professor, Department of Banking and Finance, National Chiayi University, 580 Sinmin Road, Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan
  •   Shu-Hui Ho MBA student, Graduate Institute of Finance, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Shuefu Rd. Neipu, Pingtung County 912

Keywords:

Prospect Theory

, Loss Aversion, Utility Measurement

G11

, G17

Paper Submission Date

, May 5, 2013, Paper sent back for Revision, May 30, Paper Acceptance Date, June 22, 2013.

Abstract

This paper designs a binary prospect questionnaire according to previous literature for extracting the certainty equivalents of gains and losses prospects. Individual utility function is defined by the power utility function, in which the gain power parameter and loss power parameter are estimated by the least squares method. The respondents for the present study comprised of 20 common people, 20 MBA students, and 20 financial workers, and the main findings are as follows. First, individuals revealed risk averse attributes for gains and losses, but the risk averse magnitude for gains was larger than it was for losses. Second, the individual utility function is likely concave. Third, relative to others, the financial workers were less loss averse. Finally, women were generally more loss averse than men.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-01

How to Cite

Wang, M.-L., Huang, H.-H., & Ho, S.-H. (2013). Measurement of Loss Aversion Behavior Under Prospect Theory: Comparison of Various Kinds of Individuals. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(9), 5–15. Retrieved from https://www.indianjournalofcapitalmarkets.com/index.php/IJF/article/view/72087

References

Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53 (10), 1659-1674.

Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt H. & L'Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospcet theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36 (3), 245-266.

Brooks, P., & Zank, H. (2005). Loss averse behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31 (3), 301-325.

Dimmock, S.G., & Kouwenberg, R. (2010). Loss-aversion and household Portfolio Choice. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17 (3), 441-459.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-292.

Levy, M. (2010). Loss aversion and the price of risk. Quantitative Finance, 10 (9), 1009-1022. DOI:10.1080/14697680903059416.

Mehta, S.K., & Aggarwal, N. (2011). The effect of demographics on investment choice: An empirical study of investors in Jammu. Indian Journal of Finance, 5 (10), 43-55.

Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53 (5), 1775-1798. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00072.

Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40 (3), 777-790, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x.

Singh, R. & Bhowal, A. (2009). Risk perception dynamics and equity share investment behaviour. Indian Journal of Finance, 3 (6), 23-30.

Thaler, R.H. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (1), 39-60.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297-323.

Weber, M. & Camerer, C.F. (1998). The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavion and Organization, 33 (2), 167-184.