Efficiency of Private Sector Banks in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i10/71847Keywords:
Data Envelopment Analysis
, Technical Efficiency Pure Technical Efficiency, Scale Efficiency, Private Sector BanksC61
, C67, G21, P17Paper Submission Date
, June 17, 2014, Paper sent back for Revision, July 19, Paper Acceptance Date, August 2, 2014.Abstract
This paper examined the relative efficiency of all the private sector banks in India from 2008 to 2013 using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and ICICI Bank were relatively efficient in terms of technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency. The average (overall) technical inefficiency score during the study period was found to be 6%. In terms of pure technical efficiency, apart from the above three banks, HDFC Bank and Nainital Bank were also relatively efficient. The average (overall) pure technical inefficiency score during the study period was found to be 5%. Positive correlation ranging from 0.7 to 0.95 was observed between return on assets and different types of efficiencies during the study period (except for the year 2008-09). Negative correlation ranging from -0.3 to 0.5 was observed between non - performing assets ratio and different types of efficiencies during the study period (except for the year 2008-09).Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Ab-Rahim, R., Md-Nor,N.G., Ramlee, S., & Ubaidillah, N. Z. (2012). Determinants of cost efficiency in Malaysian banking. International Journal of Business and Society, 13 (3), 355 - 374.
Arjonmandi, A. (2011). Efficiency and productivity in Iran's financial institutions (Ph.D thesis). School of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3386
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper,W. W.(1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. DOI :http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Benston, G.J. (1965). Branch banking and economies of scale. The Journal of Finance, 20 (2), 312-331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb00212.x
Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98 (2), 175 - 212. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6
Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. A. K., & Sahay, P. (1997).The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98 (2), 332-345. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00351-7
Boitumelo, D. M. (2008). Efficiency and productivity in Botswana's financial institutions (Ph.D thesis). School of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/728
Chandrasekhar, M., & Sonar, R. (2008). Impact of information technology on the efficiency and total factor productivity of Indian banks. South Asian Journal of Management, 15 (3), 74-91.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429 - 444.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (Eds.) (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Boston, MA : Springer Science.
Jagwani, B. (2012). Efficiency measurement in the Indian banking industry: An application of data envelopment analysis. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 16 (4), 315-331. DOI: 10.1177/0972262912460191
Ketkar, K., Noulas, W., Athanasios, G., & Agarwal, M. M. (2003). An analysis of efficiency and productivity growth of the Indian banking sector. Finance India, 17 (2), 511-521.
Kumar, L., Malathy, D., & Ganesh, L. S. (2010). Productivity growth and efficiency change in Indian banking: Technology effect vs catch - up effect. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 7 (2), 194 - 218. DOI: 10.1108/09727981011084995
Kumar, S., & Gulati, R. (2010). Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of Indian public sector banks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59 (1), 51-74. DOI: 10.1108/17410401011006112
Leightner, J.E., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1998). The impact of financial liberalization on the performances of Thai banks. Journal of Economics & Business, 50, 115 - 131.
Makkar, A., & Singh, S. (2013). Analysis of the financial performance of Indian commercial banks: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Finance, 7 (5), 41 - 49.
Marcochi, D. C. (2006). Efficiency in the Brazilian banking industry: A data envelopment analysis approach (Doctor of Philosophy thesis).Webster University, Missouri, United States.
Mariappan, P., & Sreeaarthi, G. (2013). Application of data envelopment analysis [DEA] to study the performance efficiency of the scheduled commercial banks of India. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 3 (8), 52-70.
Sealey Jr., C.W. & Lindley, J.T. (1977). Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. The Journal of Finance, 32 (4), 1251-1266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03324.x
Shanmugam, K.R., & Das, A. (2004). Efficiency of Indian commercial banks during the reform period. Applied Financial Economics, 14 (9), 681-686. DOI:10.1080/0960310042000233458
Sharma, V. K., & Kumar, A. (2013). Assessment of performance of commercial banks in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 7 (12), 47 - 54.
Sufian, F. (2007). Trends in the efficiency of Singapore's commercial banking groups : A non stochastic frontier DEA window analysis approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56 (2), 99-136. DOI: 10.1108/17410400710722626
Sufian, F. (2011). Benchmarking the efficiency of the Korean banking sector: A DEA approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18 (1), 107-127. DOI: 10.1108/14635771111109841
Tahir, I. M., Bakar, N. M. A., & Haron, S. (2009). Evaluating efficiency of Malaysian banks using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 8 (4), 96-106. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n8p96
