The Nature and Determinants of Capital Structure in Indian Service Firms

Authors

  •   Uday Kumar Jagannathan Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Commerce, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore - 560 054
  •   N. Suresh Professor & Dean, Faculty of Management and Commerce, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore - 560 054

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i11/119340

Keywords:

Debt-to-Asset Ratio

, Mean Reversion, Pecking Order Theory, Static Tradeoff Theory

D24

, G3, G32, L8

Paper Submission Date

, December 2, 2016, Paper sent back for Revision, June 19, 2017, Paper Acceptance Date, September 15, 2017.

Abstract

In the Indian context, the service sector has played an important role in the development of the economy since reforms in 1991, and is expected to continue to contribute significantly to the growth in the economy in the coming decades. With this rationale, service firms were selected for the study for the time frame from 2011 to 2015, and the nature and determinants of their capital structure are studied. Since interest expense gives tax shelter to firms, the trade-off theory suggests that firms may be incentivized to use these shelters and thus increase leverage. Therefore, this theory was put to test here. The pecking order theory which states that the firm will raise capital from internal accruals followed by debt and finally equity was supported by the research in this paper. Further conclusion derived from the study was that capital structure, as measured by debt-to-asset ratio, remained stable in the 5- year period with an industry average of about 0.31. This study also tested the hypothesis on the trade off model of capital structure, which stated that there is an optimal capital structure which firms tend to move toward, and several approaches were adopted to measure if this hypothesis was true. While firms' debt level in a year could be reasonably predicted by the debt-to-asset ratio in the prior year, the fit of the OLS regression became progressively worse as the number of lagging years was increased, suggesting that capital structure was sticky. The industry debt-to-asset ratio, while statistically significant as a predictor of firm debt level, resulted in a regression with a poor overall fit. While there is evidence to accept the pecking order hypothesis, there was not enough evidence to reject the trade-off model of capital structure for Indian service firms in the selected time period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

Jagannathan, U. K., & Suresh, N. (2017). The Nature and Determinants of Capital Structure in Indian Service Firms. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(11), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i11/119340

References

Adewale, M. T., & Ajibola, O. B. (2013). Does capital structure enhance firm performance? Evidence from Nigeria. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 12(4), 43 - 55 .

Alipour, M., Mohammadi, M. F. S., & Derakhshan, H. (2015). Determinants of capital structure: An empirical study of firms in Iran. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(1), 53-83. doi : https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2013-0004

Amsaveni, R., & Gomathi, S. (2012). Determinants of capital structure: A study of the pharmaceutical industry in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 6 (3), 4-14.

Banerjee, A., & De, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to capital structure decisions in Indian iron and steel industry: An empirical study. Paradigm, 18(1), 35 - 50.

Bhaduri, S. N. (2002). Determinants of capital structure choice: A study of the Indian corporate sector. Applied Financial Economics, 12 (9), 655 - 665.

Degryse, H., de Goeij, P., & Kappert, P. (2012). The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms’ capital structure. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 431- 447. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-010-9281-8

Foo, V., Jamal, A. A. A., Karim, M. R. A., & Ulum, Z. K. A. B. (2015). Capital structure and corporate performance: Panel evidence from oil and gas companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 6 (6), 371 - 379.

Gharaibeh, A. M. (2015). The determinants of capital structure: Empirical evidence from Kuwait. European Journal of Business, Economics and Accountancy, 3 (6), 1-25.

Gharaibeh, H., & Al-Najjar, B. (2010). Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Jordanian data. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 3 (2), 185 - 194.

Haque, F., Arun, T. G., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2011). Corporate governance and capital structure in developing countries: A case study of Bangladesh. Applied Economics, 43 (6), 673- 681. doi: 10.1080/00036840802599909

Hiran, S. A., & Sojatia, M. (2015). An empirical analysis of capital structure and long term solvency position of Hindalco Industries Limited. Indian Journal of Finance, 9(2), 48-55. doi:10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i2/71528

Kaur, R., & Rao, N. K. (2009). Determinants of capital structure: Experience of Indian cotton textile industry. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 6 (2), 97 - 112.

Morellec, E., Nikolov, B., & Schürhoff, N. (2012). Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 803 - 848. doi10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01735.x

Nguyen, D. T. T., Diaz-Rainey, I., & Gregoriou, A. (2014). Determinants of the capital structure of listed Vietnamese companies. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE), 31(3), 412- 431.

Norvaišiene, R., & Stankevièiene, J. (2007). The interaction of internal determinants and decisions on capital structure at the Baltic listed companies. Engineering Economics, 52 (2), 7 - 17.

Nunkoo, P. K., & Boateng, A. (2010). The empirical determinants of target capital structure and adjustment to long-run target: evidence from Canadian firms. Applied Economics Letters, 17(10), 983 - 990.

Panno, A. (2003). An empirical investigation on the determinants of capital structure: The UK and Italian experience. Applied Financial Economics, 13 (2), 97-112.

Serrasqueiro, Z., & Caetano, A. (2015). Trade-off theory versus pecking order theory: Capital structure decisions in a peripheral region of Portugal. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16 (2), 445 - 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.744344

Shahzad, A., Shahid, M. A., Sohail, A., & Azeem, M. (2015). Investigating the impact of corporate governance on capital structure: A Case of KSE-listed companies. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 14 (2), 31- 43.

Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), 219 - 244.

Srivastava, A. (2012). Determinants of capital structure in Indian Public Ltd. companies: An experience of pre and post liberalization. Indian Journal of Finance, 6 (6), 30 - 38.